Skip to content
Cross-domain evaluation / LQBENCH-QGI/0.7

Generality begins where task-family familiarity ends.

R4 turns the evaluation design into a public demonstration contract: task manifests, held-out transfer, evidence packets, failure records and explicit resource budgets.

Task families

Eight quantitative problem families designed to travel across domains.

EVALUATION DESIGN
TF-01

State estimation under partial observation

Infer latent quantitative state from incomplete, noisy or delayed observations without inventing unobserved certainty.

REPRESENTATIONUNCERTAINTYPREDICTION
TF-02

Forecasting under regime shift

Predict beyond the calibration regime and identify when distribution shift invalidates prior assumptions.

PREDICTIONUNCERTAINTYTRANSFER
TF-03

Constrained optimisation

Optimise an explicit objective while respecting hard constraints, feasibility and reproducible solver conditions.

MODELINGOPTIMIZATIONEVIDENCE
TF-04

Inverse problem reconstruction

Recover plausible hidden parameters or structures from observable consequences and report non-identifiability.

REPRESENTATIONMODELINGUNCERTAINTY
TF-05

Simulator-guided control

Choose bounded actions in a dynamic simulator while preserving state, constraints and stop conditions.

SIMULATIONOPTIMIZATIONAUTONOMY
TF-06

Experiment selection

Select the next measurement or simulation to reduce uncertainty or discriminate between competing hypotheses.

EXPERIMENT_DESIGNUNCERTAINTYMEMORY
TF-07

Multifidelity transfer

Compose cheap and expensive quantitative engines while preserving error bounds and domain validity.

SIMULATIONTRANSFERMODELING
TF-08

Evidence and provenance audit

Reconstruct how a quantitative conclusion was produced and fail closed when lineage, runtime or uncertainty evidence is missing.

EVIDENCEMEMORYAUTONOMY
Cross-domain matrix

One task family. Different quantitative worlds.

A QGI claim should survive materially different system dynamics, data structures, constraints and sources of uncertainty.

Task familyStochastic & economic systemsPhysical & dynamical systemsEngineering & design systemsMolecular & biological systemsMaterials & scientific systems
TF-01
TF-02
TF-03
TF-04
TF-05
TF-06
TF-07
TF-08

A filled cell means the protocol permits a task instance in that domain. It is not a claim that LargeQuant or another system has passed that cell.

Evaluation execution

From pre-registered task to evidence-bearing result.

01Pre-register

Freeze task manifest, tools, metrics, budgets and failure rules.

02Run baselines

Execute reference systems under the same task contract.

03Run candidate

Use matched seeds or instances where stochasticity matters.

04Verify evidence

Check outputs, uncertainty, resources, provenance and reproducibility.

05Publish vector

Report domain-native metrics and capability dimensions, not a magic number.

Evaluation manifest

What was evaluated?

evaluation_idprotocol_versionsystem_idsystem_versiontask_manifest_hashbaseline_idsheld_out_regimerun_countresource_budgetenvironment_hashevidence_bundle_idstarted_atcompleted_at
Result record

What actually happened?

evaluation_idtask_idtask_versiondomaindimension_vectorprimary_metricsecondary_metricsuncertainty_metricsbaseline_relative_metricsresource_metricsstatusfailure_reasonevidence_hash

R4 creates the publication path for evidence-backed QGI demonstrations. It still does not fabricate results.

Public result arrays remain empty until benchmark tasks are executed under this protocol.

Demonstration protocol